VBR in theory will produce better quality with smaller filesizes. In your
case I would suggest something like: -h -V3 -b160. I have found LAMEs
VBR to be very good these days and use -b32.
Ross.
lewst wrote:
> > I am a musician. I notice crap when I go below 192. I would stay
> > at 224 or 256. your options are fine. If you have a bunch of files
> > to do then use a batch process.
>
> Thanks for your response. Another question is whether VBR or CBR
> produces better quality sound? For example, how do the following
> compare?
>
> % lame -h -b 192 sample.wav sample.mp3
>
> VS.
>
> % lame -h -v -b 112 sample.wav sample.mp3
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Send online invitations with Yahoo! Invites.
> http://invites.yahoo.com
> --
> MP3 ENCODER mailing list ( http://geek.rcc.se/mp3encoder/ )
--
MP3 ENCODER mailing list ( http://geek.rcc.se/mp3encoder/ )
