> VBR in theory will produce better quality with smaller filesizes. > In your case I would suggest something like: -h -V3 -b160. "-h -V3 -b160" does produce smaller files than "-h -b 192", but which one produces better quality? Thanks. __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Send online invitations with Yahoo! Invites. http://invites.yahoo.com -- MP3 ENCODER mailing list ( http://geek.rcc.se/mp3encoder/ )
- [MP3 ENCODER] best LAME options for high quality audio? lewst
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] best LAME options for high qualit... Kali Griffin
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] best LAME options for high qualit... Nils Faerber
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] best LAME options for high qualit... lewst
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] best LAME options for high qualit... lewst
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] best LAME options for high qu... Mark Taylor
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] best LAME options for high qu... Sean Harding
- RE: [MP3 ENCODER] best LAME options for high qualit... francois
- RE: [MP3 ENCODER] best LAME options for high qualit... Ross Levis
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] best LAME options for high qualit... Bert Konstantin
- Re[2]: [MP3 ENCODER] best LAME options for high... c2woody
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] best LAME options for hig... Mark Taylor
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] best LAME options for... Shawn Riley
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] best LAME options for... Takehiro Tominaga
