>>>>> "S" == Sigbjrn Skjret <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> The binaries runs fine, and "make test" result is OK, too. but
>> the speed is slower than the no hacked version.... *sigh*
S> It's faster here, but as mentioned of very poor quality. :/
BTW, is it the same result, with or without -h option ?
---
Takehiro TOMINAGA // may the source be with you!
--
MP3 ENCODER mailing list ( http://geek.rcc.se/mp3encoder/ )
- [MP3 ENCODER] hack for IEEE754 FPU Takehiro Tominaga
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] hack for IEEE754 FPU Dmitry
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] hack for IEEE754 FPU Sigbj�rn Skj�ret
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] hack for IEEE754 FPU Takehiro Tominaga
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] hack for IEEE754 FPU Sigbj�rn Skj�ret
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] hack for IEEE754 FPU Takehiro Tominaga
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] hack for IEEE754... Takehiro Tominaga
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] hack for IEE... Naoki Shibata
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] hack for IEEE754... Sigbj�rn Skj�ret
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] hack for IEEE754 FPU Monty
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] hack for IEEE754 FPU David Balazic
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] hack for IEEE754 FPU Gabriel Bouvigne
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] hack for IEEE754 FPU Sigbj�rn Skj�ret
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] hack for IEEE754 FPU Wilfried Behne
