>    >> The binaries runs fine, and "make test" result is OK, too.  but
>    >> the speed is slower than the no hacked version.... *sigh*
>    S> It's faster here, but as mentioned of very poor quality. :/
>BTW, is it the same result, with or without -h option ?

-h gives a much better mp3, but there's still blurbs and noise in it. :P


- CISC

--
MP3 ENCODER mailing list ( http://geek.rcc.se/mp3encoder/ )

Reply via email to