> >> The binaries runs fine, and "make test" result is OK, too. but > >> the speed is slower than the no hacked version.... *sigh* > S> It's faster here, but as mentioned of very poor quality. :/ >BTW, is it the same result, with or without -h option ? -h gives a much better mp3, but there's still blurbs and noise in it. :P - CISC -- MP3 ENCODER mailing list ( http://geek.rcc.se/mp3encoder/ )
- [MP3 ENCODER] hack for IEEE754 FPU Takehiro Tominaga
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] hack for IEEE754 FPU Dmitry
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] hack for IEEE754 FPU Sigbj�rn Skj�ret
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] hack for IEEE754 FPU Takehiro Tominaga
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] hack for IEEE754 FPU Sigbj�rn Skj�ret
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] hack for IEEE754 FPU Takehiro Tominaga
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] hack for IEEE754... Takehiro Tominaga
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] hack for IEE... Naoki Shibata
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] hack for IEEE754... Sigbj�rn Skj�ret
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] hack for IEEE754 FPU Monty
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] hack for IEEE754 FPU David Balazic
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] hack for IEEE754 FPU Gabriel Bouvigne
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] hack for IEEE754 FPU Sigbj�rn Skj�ret
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] hack for IEEE754 FPU Wilfried Behne
