Sigbj�rn Skj�ret schrieb am Die, 16 Mai 2000:
> >> Just thought I'd note that MPEG 2.5 is more or less broken at lower
> >> bitrates, and that the filters seem screwy at low frequencies...
> >> Try the following: (preferably with a 8kHz sample)
> >> "LAME --resample 8 -b 8 <input> <output>" (MPEG2.5)
> >> -> Notice how everything is garbled.
> >just add a "--noshort -mm" here
>
> The sample I tested with was already mono .. and if --noshort is needed in
> MPEG2.5, why isn't it default?
>
> - CISC
there is no need for --noshort in general with MPEG2.5,
but this combination of 8 kHz and 8 kbits seems to require it.
maybe there are simply not enough bits for short blocks.
mpeg2.5 support is relatively new in Lame and there is some
more fine tuning necessary. All your feedback is welcome ;)
Robert
--
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
homepage: http://linux.unixcity.de/catwalk/index.html
--
MP3 ENCODER mailing list ( http://geek.rcc.se/mp3encoder/ )
