>> >> "LAME --resample 8 -b 8 <input> <output>" (MPEG2.5)
>> >> -> Notice how everything is garbled.
>> >just add a "--noshort -mm" here
>> The sample I tested with was already mono .. and if --noshort is needed in
>> MPEG2.5, why isn't it default?
>there is no need for --noshort in general with MPEG2.5,
>but this combination of 8 kHz and 8 kbits seems to require it.
>maybe there are simply not enough bits for short blocks.
Well, I just tested, and it still sounds garbled at 8kHz .. however if I
upsample to f.ex. 11kHz, it sounds much better (although not perfect (16kHz
sounds better, which I find weird. ;) ))
>mpeg2.5 support is relatively new in Lame and there is some
>more fine tuning necessary. All your feedback is welcome ;)
Yep, and afaics it's slightly broken. ;)
- CISC
--
MP3 ENCODER mailing list ( http://geek.rcc.se/mp3encoder/ )
