> lame -d -h -X 6 -Y -Z --cwlimit 12 --lowpass 15.1 --resample 32 -b
> 128 ...
>
> This gives *very* acceptable results in the studio on all the test
> cases I last tried two months ago, including a very difficult track
> of choral music.
>
I just have 2 observations:
*to my mind, you should remove -d. This switch allows to have different
blocks on the left and on the right, but as it's implemented right now, it
requires a little more bits than without. So for vbr encoding, it's not a
problem, but in your case, I think that it could reduce the quality (ok,
just a little, something like 1%, but each percent of quality is important)
* as you're using the --resample switch, I think that it would be better to
remove the --lowpass switch. It's better, to my mind, to let Lame choose the
lowpass freq, and thus avoid any possible resampling noise that may be
introduced.
Moreover, using a 15.1 kHz lowpass freq with 32kHz resampling is impossible.
So in this case I think that it produces the same results as -k (full freq
bandwidth). But once again, I personnally would avoid it.
Regards,
--
Gabriel Bouvigne - France
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
icq: 12138873
MP3' Tech: www.mp3-tech.org
--
MP3 ENCODER mailing list ( http://geek.rcc.se/mp3encoder/ )
