Gabriel Bouvigne wrote:
> to my mind, you should remove -d. This switch allows to have different blocks
on the left and on the right, but as it's implemented right now, it requires a
little more bits than without.
Thank you very much for the advice which I shall gladly take.
> * as you're using the --resample switch, I think that it would be better to
> remove the --lowpass switch. It's better, to my mind, to let Lame choose the
> lowpass freq, and thus avoid any possible resampling noise that may be
> introduced.
OK, my choice of --lowpass 15.1 is simply based on seeing LAME use around 14kHz
as a default, and my trying to squeeze the extra kHz bandwidth. I can't hear
any bad artefacts here, though I'm willing to be proven wrong.
> Moreover, using a 15.1 kHz lowpass freq with 32kHz resampling is impossible.
Oh, lame says it's filtering like this: "transition band: 15097 Hz - 15484
Hz", which I thought would be alright because 16kHz would be the cutoff
frequency at 32kHz sample rate. Have I got this wrong? Yes, maybe -k would be a
better idea all round anyway. Sounds fine on my sources.
All the best,
John HW
--
MP3 ENCODER mailing list ( http://geek.rcc.se/mp3encoder/ )
