>then you shoul use a lossless compression algorithm, not mp3. If
>Minidisc is high-end for you, you could use VBR (-V 0) or CBR > 256kb.
>Lame and other psycho-acoustic compression algorithms will get better.
>
well, lossless is too high end for me, i mean high-end for normal ear,
i.e. standard human subject with standard hi-fi (+or-2000$) :)
are you saying that on normal hi-fi 192 sounds different than 256?
how different? If I have to concentrate on sound to ear the difference
then i'm not interested in such quality ;-)
and that lame is better than mp3enc3.1?
bye!
--
MP3 ENCODER mailing list ( http://geek.rcc.se/mp3encoder/ )
