>
> hi (new to the list)
>
> after a simple encoding/playback test of a .wav/.mp3@256k (lame)/.vqf
> i couldnt tell the difference between the 3. where as one is 30 meg, one is
> 6 meg and one is 2.5meg.
>
> anyone investigated VQF's much (ignoring compatibility / support / time to
> encode)?
>
> thanks
>
> kenzie
>
Hi Kenzie,
What about LAME at 128kbs? files size should be about 2.7meg.
Vorbis by the way, is a VQ codec, and it is probably already
supported by more players than the proprietary vqf :-)
Mark
--
MP3 ENCODER mailing list ( http://geek.rcc.se/mp3encoder/ )
