I was just testing something that I read in an earlier message, someone had
said that they acheived greater quality by using -b %rate% -B %rate%. I
don't use it for anything I encode, I was just testing out the VBR code. I
never noticed any better quality personally.
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Gabriel Bouvigne
Sent: Saturday, July 08, 2000 2:45 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [MP3 ENCODER] new VBR code
> I forget why the -B option was added, but it should not be
> used under normal circumstances.
>
It was added because there are some decoder chips wich can't handle more
than 192k frames.
For (strange) cases like -b128 -B 128, why not made lame using cbr instead
of vbr?
Regards,
--
Gabriel Bouvigne - France
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
icq: 12138873
MP3' Tech: www.mp3-tech.org
--
MP3 ENCODER mailing list ( http://geek.rcc.se/mp3encoder/ )
--
MP3 ENCODER mailing list ( http://geek.rcc.se/mp3encoder/ )
