I was under the impression that VBR mode was better...so I have been trying
to use it. But at this point I have absolutely no idea if what I'm encoding
is better than CBR mode or not. I have absolutely no idea if I'm using a
good set of options or not. I'll probably just wait until lame is more
finished before I encode any more. Good luck guys.
-steve
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Steve Schow [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Sunday, July 09, 2000 10:33 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [MP3 ENCODER] new VBR code
>
>
> Fair enough I guess.
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Mark Taylor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Saturday, July 08, 2000 10:31 AM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: Re: [MP3 ENCODER] new VBR code
> >
> >
> >
> > >
> > > There is so much stuff constantly changing with lame....new
> > options, VBR,
> > > CBR, etc.. At this point I have totally lost touch with
> > what mode is what
> > > and which flags I should use..... I sure hope you guys
> > will start thinking
> > > more about usability at some point....
> > >
> > > -steve
> > >
> >
> > We do think about usability: That is why the best, and reccommended
> > options (described in the USAGE file), has NEVER changed! It will
> > always be:
> >
> > lame -h input.wav output.mp3
> >
> > (add -b <bitrate> for other than 128kbs).
> >
> > Everything else is under constant development and has never been
> > reccommended except for people willing to do (repeatedly) their own
> > testing and evaluation. Whenever something is proven proven to give
> > consistently better results, that feature will be enabled by default
> > with the above options.
> >
> > Mark
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > MP3 ENCODER mailing list ( http://geek.rcc.se/mp3encoder/ )
> >
>
> --
> MP3 ENCODER mailing list ( http://geek.rcc.se/mp3encoder/ )
>
--
MP3 ENCODER mailing list ( http://geek.rcc.se/mp3encoder/ )
