Re: [MP3 ENCODER] new VBR code

[Aldo Gamboa]

I cannot see the point in using -V0 with "-b %bitrate% -B %bitrate%". I�ve
been trying, and can�t see (or hear) the difference.
Maybe it�s just me, but I suppose -V0 *must* encode with optimum quality. I
don�t know... In this case, if we want minbitrate AND maxbitrate to be 128,
why don�t try CBR enconding, sending "lame -h -b128 input.wav output.mp3"?  On
the other hand, why not use -V1 or -V2, or even -abr?
Or maybe I missed something, anyway...

Cheers,
Aldo
(Rio de Janeiro - Brasil)


--
MP3 ENCODER mailing list ( http://geek.rcc.se/mp3encoder/ )