Hello Mark,
Sunday, July 09, 2000, 9:24:15 PM, you wrote:
MT> I do all my testing at 128kbs and lower, and I still
MT> feel that 128kbs CBR is on average better than VBR (128kbs average)
MT> At higher bitrates, (see r3mix.net for example), there is
MT> some evidence that VBR outperforms CBR. But this is mostly
MT> based on signal processing tests - not hearing tests. hearing
MT> tests are hard to perform at such high bitrates because
MT> everything sounds pretty good, and I think the evidence
MT> is not conclusive either way.
I wrote on my site that the new VBR is best not used for archiving,
because of the many bugs. I'm always up to some listening/tweaking
tests etc, but no-one here seems to respond to some remarks. I wish I
was able myself to change the code, but I admit this kind of brainwork
is somewhat out of my leage at the moment.
Anyone have a remark to that 'qadjust' variable issue? thanks
MT> Mark
MT> --
MT> MP3 ENCODER mailing list ( http://geek.rcc.se/mp3encoder/ )
--
Best regards,
Roel mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
MP3 ENCODER mailing list ( http://geek.rcc.se/mp3encoder/ )
