Hello Stephan, Wednesday, August 02, 2000, 12:23:01 PM, you wrote: SE> No! I realy mean 3.85 -q1. And it�s very audible. SE> I will give some samples, if anyone tells me where I can upload them. (never SE> done before) thanks! would be nice. if you cannot find a place to upload them/email to, just email me, and I'll give you name/pwd. -- Best regards, Roel mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- MP3 ENCODER mailing list ( http://geek.rcc.se/mp3encoder/ )
- [MP3 ENCODER] 3.86a, bug with -h ? Jack Davis
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] 3.86a, bug with -h ? Stephan Ebertsh�user
- Re[2]: [MP3 ENCODER] 3.86a, bug with -h ? Roel VdB
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] 3.86a, bug with -h ? Stephan Ebertsh�user
- Re[2]: [MP3 ENCODER] 3.86a, bug with... Roel VdB
- Re[2]: [MP3 ENCODER] 3.86a, bug with... Roel VdB
- Re: Re[2]: [MP3 ENCODER] 3.86a,... Frank Klemm
- Re: Re[2]: [MP3 ENCODER] 3.... Gabriel Bouvigne
- Re: Re[2]: [MP3 ENCODER... Frank Klemm
- Re: Re[2]: [MP3 ENCODER... Robert Hegemann
- Re: Re[2]: [MP3 ENCODER... Frank Klemm
- Re: Re[2]: [MP3 ENCODER... Robert Hegemann
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] 3.86a, bu... Mark Taylor
- [MP3 ENCODER] ATH Shawn Riley
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] 3.86a, bug with -h ? Robert Hegemann
