:: -32000Hz files, filled with noise and
:: "Lame -q1 -d -m j -V 2 -B 192 --lowpass 12.0 Hobbit.wav
:: Hobbit-q1.mp3"
:: and
::
:: "Lame -h -d -v -q1 jo3.wav jo3q1.wav"
::
:: | 56 - 3 - 1,8%
:: ||| 64 - 11 - 6,7%
:: |||||||||||||||| 80 - 52 - 31,7%
:: |||||||||||||||||| 96 - 59 - 36,0%
:: ||||||||| 112 - 28 - 17,1%
:: || 128 - 5 - 3,0%
:: | 160 - 4 - 2,4%
::
:: is not really what I would use to archive material. could you try
:: adding "-b128" and listening how it sounds then? sounds ok
:: to me now.
::
:: It's just: -q1 is a bit more agressive, but with -b128 (-V1), I never
:: have encountered a file that sounds poor.
::
:: I like -q1 alot, but as MT said once @ lower bitrate there is a higher
:: risk of problems, I just take the -b128 and never any problems.
::
What about an option "adjust-level-for-psycho-model", which increases the
level for the threshold computation, so low level music is coded with more
bits. To my mind low level pieces of music with a turned up volume control
are coded with too less bits. lame is coding for a full scale SPL of about
90 dB and that's too less if you are listening at >100 dB full scale SPL.
Options like '-b128' don't solve this problem. For medium level music there
are still too less bits. Only the low level parts get enough bits, may be
also too less.
--
Mit freundlichen Gr��en
Frank Klemm
eMail | [EMAIL PROTECTED] home: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
phone | +49 (3641) 64-2721 home: +49 (3641) 390545
sMail | R.-Breitscheid-Str. 43, 07747 Jena, Germany
--
MP3 ENCODER mailing list ( http://geek.rcc.se/mp3encoder/ )
