Hello,

I don't know if any, and if, how much JS (something like the choice
between MS or S) can be tweaked.

Take this for example:
http://r3mix.50g.com/velvet.zip (1900kB)

I was doing testing for Qdesign, and this was the conclusion:

> 1) FHG hq 192S : terrible, high squeeks in R channel
> 2) Lame 192 JS : terrible, sounds like someone is shaking such a wooden
>      instrument filled with sand.  less annoying than 1.
> 3) QD mp2 fast : terrible, where did the frog come from ??
> 4) QD mp3 HQ   : total mutilation, yeah! spacey effects, this is the worst around.
>                I think would sound like this when a robot has sex.
> 5) QD mp2 HQ   : low pounding distortion, L channel in start
> 6) QD mp3 fast : L channel is lost: sounds like there is an extra
>       instrument introduced. Or maybe it has been through a WMA filter
>       or so.  complete hollow sound.
> 7) xing S hfreq: starting to sound like the original.  however
>    constant noise, and I get a sea-sick sensation.  hurts my head to
>    listen.
> 8) xing S 16khz cutoff: give me a $2 pair of computer speakers and I
>    cannot distinguish this one from the original.
> 9) mystery signal: ok, besides those 2 thumps around 5.5-6 seconds on
>    normal stereo
> 10) Lame 192S   : this sounds ok.  probably not perfect, but my head
>     hurts from that xing sample.  I can enjoy this one.

So it's a hard to encode piece.
* "LAME -ms -b192 -h" sounds ok
* "LAME -mj -b192 -h" sounds certainly NOT ok

wouldn't this be a nice clip to tweak the JS a great length?  If lame
would manage to get all that noise out of the R channel in JS, by
making better decisions when to go to and from MS it would be a leap
forward.

This also offers the VBR (old/new) a big potential gain in quality
imho.  (Since audio glitches I encountered in vbr-new, ns-psytune and
others, are mostly JS related.)

btw: the piece is extremely hard to encode.  It wouldn't be abnormal
to have almost only S frames in JS mode I think.(?)

I hope someone picks up on this :)

thanks for listening

[sorry for the re-send, but after 2.5 hours the original post still
isn't on the list, so I assume it got lost somewhere...]

-- 
Best regards,
 Roel                            mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


--
MP3 ENCODER mailing list ( http://geek.rcc.se/mp3encoder/ )

Reply via email to