************************************************************************
*** WARNING -- WARNING -- WARNING -- WARNING -- WARNING -- WARNING ***
************************************************************************
*
* The e-mail-message appended below is list- or mailserver-related
*
* That type of mail will by definition not be processed on this system
* and in general is not accepted in the fidonet.org-domain.
*
* To avoid these bouncings the listkeeper is kindly requested to
* remove any subscription coming from a z2.fidonet.org-style address.
*
* If you have reason to believe your message was removed without due
* reason then kindly inform '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'.
*
************************************************************************
From: Sigbj�rn Skj�ret @2:292/862
To: Sergey Sapelin @2:5020/1844.33
Subj.: Re: [MP3 ENCODER] Please stop breaking LAME... ;)
Dated: 03 Sep 00 07:51:43
[processed here: 05 Sep 00 14:15:57]
@TOPT 33
@INTL 2:5020/1844 2:292/862
@MSGID: c2i.net 4caaf0f8
@REPLY: fuchs.offl.uni-jena.de b9b0cac3
@REPLYADDR: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
@REPLYTO: 2:292/862@fidonet UUCP
@PID: THOR 2.6a (Amiga;TCP/IP)
@CHRS: LATIN-1 2
@RFC-Received: from geek.rcc.se ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [193.15.234.212]) by
infomag.iguana.be (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id MAA21333 for
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun, 3 Sep 2000 12:33:36 +0200
@RFC-Received: (from majordom@localhost) by geek.rcc.se (8.8.4/8.7.3) id
GAA03432 for mp3encoder-list; Sun, 3 Sep 2000 06:54:12 +0200
@RFC-X-Authentication-Warning: geek.rcc.se: majordom set sender to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] using -f
@RFC-Received: from golf.dax.net (golf.dax.net [193.216.69.103]) by geek.rcc.se
(8.8.4/8.7.3) with ESMTP id GAA03429 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun, 3 Sep
2000 06:54:10 +0200
@RFC-Received: from mp-217-210-2.daxnet.no (mp-217-210-2.daxnet.no
[193.217.210.2]) by golf.dax.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id GAA29101 for
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun, 3 Sep 2000 06:57:54 +0200 (MET DST)
@RFC-In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
@RFC-Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
@RFC-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: "Sigbj�rn Skj�ret" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Frank Klemm" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>:: Please check that your code compiles and works ok before checking it in
>:: to the CVS ...
>::
>That doesn't help fully to solve the problem. Compiler and runtime libs are
>different. So the check can only be done for one (or two) compilers.
Still, it's not fun when certain files fail to compile because of silly
errors (like conflicting prototypes). ;)
>Currently my aim is, that the program is compilable with:
> gcc 2.95.2
> g++ 2.95.2
I run gcc 2.95.(3) and SAS/C (the latter is usually much more helpful on
warnings, and still much more forgiving on "errors")...
>:: Also it would be nice if you cast types that don't match the functions
>:: types into the correct one
>Casting is a bad thing. Correct the reason for the casting, not the warning
>(or the error in C++) itself. See Ada Rationale. It is Ada related, but the
>reasons are the same for every procedural language like C, Pascal, Ada, ...
Ofcos, as I said, the best thing is to use the correct one to begin with, but
if that isn't possible, atleast cast the value into the correct one.
- CISC
--
MP3 ENCODER mailing list ( http://geek.rcc.se/mp3encoder/ )
@Via ifmail 2:292/862@fidonet, Sun Sep 3 2000 at 12:33 (2.14-tx8.10)
@Via D'Bridge 1.58 2:292/854 09/05 14:07
--
MP3 ENCODER mailing list ( http://geek.rcc.se/mp3encoder/ )
