Well, I just compared speed: Xing is about 4 times faster than Lame in VBR
mode.
Regards,
Wim Speekenbrink
----- Original Message -----
From: "Zia Mazhar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, September 29, 2000 9:54 AM
Subject: Re: [MP3 ENCODER] MP3 encoding speed : LAME & XING
| > The Xing MP3 encoder is exceptionally fast. Do they cut corners to get
such high
| > performance? Is their code written in assember?
|
| Who knows how did they program it... But they did sacrifice some quality.
|
| >
| >
| > What (if any) chance of getting similar speed out of LAME?
|
| LAME is pretty fast too. I haven't benchmarked and compared both, though.
Would you
| please do it and post the results? :-)
|
| >
| >
| > The Xing encoder is quite limited with regard to input sampling
frequencies and
| > output bitrates. Has anyone done testing on quality?
|
| LAME definitely delivers higher quality than Xing. Xing isn't the worst
encoder, but
| isn't the best either.
|
| >
| >
| > Owen
| >
|
| - Zia
|
|
| --
| MP3 ENCODER mailing list ( http://geek.rcc.se/mp3encoder/ )
|
--
MP3 ENCODER mailing list ( http://geek.rcc.se/mp3encoder/ )
