On Fri, 6 Oct 2000, engdev wrote:

> > You're right Mark, compared to Lame 387 MMX --abr 128 Xing is only two
> > times faster Bo)
> >
> > Regards,
> > Wim Speekenbrink
> 
> Using 160kbps for both LAME and Xing, encoding "Dire straits - telegraph road"
> 
> LAME takes about 1.5 times longer than Xing.

Is that the MMX version of LAME?

Mark Powell - UNIX System Administrator - The University of Salford
Academic Information Services, Clifford Whitworth Building,
Salford University, Manchester, M5 4WT, UK.
Tel: +44 161 295 5936  Fax: +44 161 295 5888  www.pgp.com for PGP key

--
MP3 ENCODER mailing list ( http://geek.rcc.se/mp3encoder/ )

Reply via email to