Great! Just one thing - does the fact big_values
is limited to 8192 now mean a loss of quality?
>Imposing a maximum value of 8191 is a completely unneeded restriction
which results in a (very tiny) loss of quality.
I don't get this, since apparantly, it is a needed
restriction. Or is it like this: dist10 uses 8206 after adding 15 to big_values and LAME used to add 15 to 8206? I'm
confused. Does this mean LAME complies to the ISO spec now or was the ISO spec
incorrectly specified?
-Youri
