On Thu, 4 Oct 2001 14:24:58 +0200, Roel VdB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>Hello Alexander,
>
>Thursday, October 04, 2001, 11:29:04 AM, you wrote:
>
>AL> On  3 Okt, Brent Geery wrote:
>>> Just curious, as I have a large batch of CDs I want to convert, and
>>> was hoping to us 3.90 on them, but I don't trust alpha releases.
>
>AL> There are no known bugs in the actual alpha version (as long as you
>AL> didn't use the nogap feature, but there was a commit regarding the nogap
>AL> feature, perhaps it's fixed now).
>
>- the short diff I submitted (or similar) for that padding in the LAME
>Tag wasn't yet committed.
>
>- some people (Dors from RazorLame) said there might be something
>wrong with the Xing/LAME Tag now @ very low mpeg 2.5 bitrates.
>
>(- Mark made the preparations but the ReplayGain code (C source
>available here: http://www.geocities.com/snelgman/
> - nogap still isn't working, but given no one has made the intention
> to write that AAAAA____BBB -> AAAA + A____BBB correction, I don't
> think this is for this beta ;) )
>
> the last two aren't "bugs", but the first (two) would imo best be
> addressed before the next beta, given the tag will be fully
> functional, aside the ReplayGain field.

Maybe I'll wait until this LAME tag thing gets fully implemented in
the alpha.  I think the idea is fantastic, and don't want to be
without them!  How much time are you talking about here, for full LAME
tag implementation?

PS: Why is the Reply-to field not the list address!  I keep forgetting
to change it, and I jeep replying directly to the author of the
message.  No other mailing list I am a member of are set up like this,
and the current situation is very frustrating.

-- 
BRENT - The Usenet typo king. :)

Fast Times At Ridgemont High Info http://www.FastTimesAtRidgemontHigh.org
  Voted #87 - American Film Institute's Top 100 Funniest American Films
_______________________________________________
mp3encoder mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://minnie.tuhs.org/mailman/listinfo/mp3encoder

Reply via email to