Hi Ross! On Fri, 05 Oct 2001, Ross Levis wrote:
> jeremy brand wrote: > > >It is quite offensive when people on this list all guess my intentions for > >writing such a patch. Nobody has got it right yet, even after I told this > >list my intentions in some of the first few emails on this thread. It > >seems very convenient to forget the facts, doesn't it! > > I'm sure I've read all the messages on this thread but I am still to > learn the logical reason to remove the text from frame padding. As > mentioned before, the text doesn't decrease quality or add any length to > the file. The only use it has is to attempt to hide the fact that an > MP3 was created by LAME. I would like to hear what advantage this has > to anyone other than criminals. > There is no logical reason. He implies its an "aestethical" (cosmetic) reason. Side effect: will make LGPL violations easier. Recommended course of action: Ignore. -- $B!V$3$N%;!<%i!<%`!<%s$,7n$K$+$o$C$F!#!#!#!!$*$7$*$-$h!*!W(B $B!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!7nLn$&$5$.!"#1#9#9#2!#(B $B!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!VH~>/=w@o;N%;!<%i!<%`!<%s!W(B Home page: http://www.geocities.com/tokyo/6905 Anime radio: http://www.live365.com/stations/124148 Jpop/Jrock radio: http://www.live365.com/stations/228551 perl -le '$_="6110>374086;2064208213:90<307;55";tr[0->][ LEOR!AUBGNSTY];print' _______________________________________________ mp3encoder mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://minnie.tuhs.org/mailman/listinfo/mp3encoder
