Can we add another column to the wiki page for the build and tune results:

Can we show the architecture as printed by config.guess, e.g. k8 or
nehalem or core2 or penryn, etc.

Bill.

On 12 May 2010 17:38, Bill Hart <[email protected]> wrote:
> That shouldn't be necessary in this case. We simply need to remove all the old
>
> #define GCDEXT_THRESHOLD                  0  /* always */
>
> from the gmp-mparam.h files. Default tuning parameters are provided if
> this is missing.
>
> Bill.
>
> On 12 May 2010 17:32, Jason Moxham <[email protected]> wrote:
>> After tuning atom passes .
>> I've done tuning for K7 and atom .
>>
>> Perhaps we should put in some "asserts" to check that the params supplied
>> satisfy the required conditions  ,like
>>
>> #if ! TUNED_BUILD && TOOM3_THRESHOLD < 3
>> #error bad params
>> #endif
>>
>>
>> On Wednesday 12 May 2010 17:20:34 Bill Hart wrote:
>>> Oh yeah, that's what's causing the test failures on k8. This hasn't
>>> been tuned for yet. We can't do testing until the tuning is done.
>>>
>>> On 12 May 2010 17:14, Jason Moxham <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> > On Wednesday 12 May 2010 17:04:45 Bill Hart wrote:
>>> >> The test failure on flavius is my new gcdext test code. I'll look into
>>> >> it right now.
>>> >
>>> > and on atom , although i've not tuned it yet
>>> >
>>> >> Bill.
>>> >>
>>> >> On 12 May 2010 16:15, Minh Nguyen <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> >> > Hi folks,
>>> >> >
>>> >> > I'm currently building revision 2923 on machines within the Skynet and
>>> >> > Sage clusters. So far, the build, test, and tuning results are posted
>>> >> > to the following wiki page:
>>> >> >
>>> >> > http://wiki.sagemath.org/mpir/BuildFarm/mpir-2.0.1
>>> >> >
>>> >> > Most of the tuning are done. I still have some more results to post to
>>> >> > that wiki page. In the meantime, people are invited to build, test,
>>> >> > tune the current revision of MPIR and report the results. Please test
>>> >> > and report your results.
>>> >> >
>>> >> > --
>>> >> > Regards
>>> >> > Minh Van Nguyen
>>> >> >
>>> >> > --
>>> >> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>> >> > Groups "mpir-devel" group. To post to this group, send email to
>>> >> > [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send
>>> >> > email to [email protected]. For more options,
>>> >> > visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/mpir-devel?hl=en.
>>> >
>>> > --
>>> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>>> > "mpir-devel" group. To post to this group, send email to
>>> > [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email
>>> > to [email protected]. For more options, visit this
>>> > group at http://groups.google.com/group/mpir-devel?hl=en.
>>
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "mpir-devel" group.
>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
>> [email protected].
>> For more options, visit this group at 
>> http://groups.google.com/group/mpir-devel?hl=en.
>>
>>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"mpir-devel" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/mpir-devel?hl=en.

Reply via email to