At 08:10 AM 10/10/2000 -0500, Luther Krueger wrote:
>
>I didn't realize that council members were to put aside their roles as
>elected officials who respond to constituent concerns. As chairs of their
>committees, I assume they have no vote in the matter? I'd like a
>clarification on this. Regardless, I stand by my previous posts to the list
>regarding Hard Times which focussed on the public information surrounding
>the business, and it is far from corruption for us to make the case against
>a business which allowed criminal activity to take place on its premises.
>It's called, "doing our duty."
But that's just it, isn't it. They didn't "allow criminal activity", in
fact the judge found that they had active policies to prevent such activity
and were willing to work on line-of-sight issues in their establishment to
make such activity even more unlikely.
And I think Jordan's quite right in that corruption here isn't about whether
you made a case, it's in _how_ you made the case.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Steven C. Anderson Longfellow area of Minneapolis
Running for Minnesota Senate, District 62: http://www.SteveAnderson.org
Hard Times customer since 1992
--
Steven C. Anderson 612-722-6658 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The Independence Party Candidate for Minnesota Senate, District 62
http://www.SteveAnderson.org/
