Repeat reminder: be sure to clip the previous post, or excerpt what you're referring
to in the body of your email.
Constant reminder: our rules allow pointed disagreement but require respectful
discussion.
--
Eva,
Walt and Robert were not given an Acceptable or
Endorsement NOT becouse they said they would not abide
by the DFL Endorsment (which dose play a big part in
our Endorsements, regardless of what some non members
think), but as Eve states we do take into
consideration how they will vote on GLBT topics as
well as other issues (such as this year the affordable
housing issue came-up quite abit in screenings). It
was becouse they did not have knowledge of the post
they were seeking (they only had experince in one or
two areas.) All of this has been stated on this list
and in privte emails with you as well as in person I
know Tim and you have talked about this!
Enough is enough,
Lee Schneider
Standish-Ericcson
12-3
--- Eva Young <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Tim Bonham sez:
> Once again, Stonewall DFL did NOT, and does not
> ever, find anyone "unacceptable". We made
> absolutely no statement at all about these
> candidates. The GLBT people & friends who make up
> StonewallDFL have been told that their "lifestyles"
> and even their very existence are unacceptable
> so many times that we certainly won't do this kind
> of name-calling toward others!
>
======================================================
> EY: As I understand it, Stonewall gives
> endorsements and "acceptable" ratings to
> candidates. Both Walt Gutzmer and Robert Lilligren
> didn't rate acceptable -- on the basis of a question
> regarding abiding by DFL endorsement -- which is not
> an issue that relates to what I understand to
> be Stonewall's focus -- that is GLBT issues. If
> someone doesn't rate as acceptable -- I would
> interpret that as a group saying someone is
> unacceptable -- but Stonewall DFL didn't call
> Gutzmer and Lilligren unacceptable directly -- but
> they did not find them acceptable. So this is a bit
> of semantics.
>
> Tim continues:
> I'm sending this message as information to the
> people on this list. I have given up on getting
> this through to Eva! I and others have responded to
> her messages on this list, and have spoken with her
> personally about this, but she persists in repeating
> this lie. I just hope others aren't fooled by her
> lie.
>
> =========================
> EY: Tim and others in Stonewall DFL have not raised
> this point to me privately on email or in person.
> When I have seen Tim at public settings, we have
> generally bantered about the Dems vs the
> Republicans -- and it's all been good natured
> bantering.
>
> Eva
> Eva Young
> Central
>
=====
Lee J Schneider - Stonewall DFL
Eletronic Communications
Newsletter Editor & Webmaster
�� WWW: �WWW.StonewallDFL.org
E-Mail: �[EMAIL PROTECTED]
E-Mail: �[EMAIL PROTECTED]
E-Mail: �[EMAIL PROTECTED]
__________________________________________________
Terrorist Attacks on U.S. - How can you help?
Donate cash, emergency relief information
http://dailynews.yahoo.com/fc/US/Emergency_Information/
_______________________________________
Minneapolis Issues Forum - Mn E-Democracy
Post messages to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest option, and more:
http://e-democracy.org/mpls
