Re: [Mpls] StonewallDFL ratings

[Rod G. K.]

Repeat reminder: be sure to clip the previous post, or excerpt what you're referring to in the body of your email. Constant reminder: our rules allow pointed disagreement but require respectful discussion. --

---

Wizard,

Thanks for finding my typo- sorry about that.

Rodney :-)

----Original Message Follows----

From: "wizardmarks" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

To: "Rod G. K." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Subject: Re: [Mpls] StonewallDFL ratings

Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2001 19:24:10 -0500

Rod G. K. wrote:

>

> Is it possible for Stonewall DFL to have another screening

> with the two final candidates in the 8th ward since there

> will be no DFL endorsement in that ward? (in other words

> isn't the DFL endorsement question mute at this point).

Actually, the point would be moot, not mute. There is no

reason for another screening nd the DFL central committee (I

think that's the committee) voted not to do so since neither

candidate wanted one.

WizardMarks, Central

>

>

> Minneapolis Issues Forum - Mn E-Democracy

> Post messages to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

> Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest option, and more:

> http://e-democracy.org/mpls

---

Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com
_______________________________________ Minneapolis Issues Forum - Mn E-Democracy Post messages to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest option, and more: http://e-democracy.org/mpls