I am angry.  I am disappointed.  And I am not surprised.

Yesterday afternoon a backhoe was delivered to tear down a turn of the
century home on my block to make way for a flood park.

It was not much to look at on the outside, but inside the woodwork was all
original varnish, oak and maple. The duplexing had been done with beauty and
craftsmanship.  The house was structurally and mechanically sound.  Inside
the floors were maple and in perfect condition.  It was a 2 bedroom and 3
bedroom: 2 family duplex.   The house needed nothing.  Many original
windows, many replacement double-pane insulated windows.  Picture rail, full
turn of the century moulding and crowns, a clawfoot tub, .... you all know
what I'm talking about.

And yet the city deemed it cost-prohibitive to move.

AND NOTHING WAS SALVAGED.  Okay, that is an overstatement.  Someone took the
balusters and rail and a few door knobs.  Nothing else.

Why are we tearing down perfectly good houses?  Replacing this duplex with a
similar quality building must cost at least a $225,000.  Why not sell it for
$10,000 with the condition it must be moved by owner by a set date?  Why not
save the cost of demo and collect a purchase price at the same time.

Where are those two affordable housing units being built in Central
Neighborhood to replace this duplex?

Lots of why questions, I know.  But I cried as this home came down and now
sits as a pile of rubble on my corner.  And it is not the first home to meet
this fate at the hands of the City.  When will it be the last?

--Kim


____________________________________________________________

Rev. Kimberly Goodman                   Phone:  612-823-4488
3700 Park Avenue                          Fax:  612-823-3194
Minneapolis, MN  55407                     [EMAIL PROTECTED]
____________________________________________________________

_______________________________________
Minneapolis Issues Forum - A Civil City Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy
Post messages to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest option, and more:
http://e-democracy.org/mpls

Reply via email to