For the record I have to say I am disappointed about what happened to
Barret Lane.  Here is a person who everyone agrees is an expert on the
complexities of the budget and city finance.  Since we are going into a
finance maelstrom we should have put our best person in a place where he
can guide us through.  It wasn't a matter of his dictating his
philosophy; he still would have to get the approval of the committee and
full council.  
It really smacks of party and special interest politics.  And possibly
an effort by those who object to fiscal responsibility if it may mean
turning down the money spigots at City Hall for their favorite programs.

I went to the special DFL Central Committee meeting on December 27,
since it was open to the public. (Thanks DFL!)   I wanted to see the
debate over the motion to keep a non-DFLer from chairing Ways and
Means.  Wish more observers had come to see the show, especially Doug
Grow.  

The meeting reenforced my distaste for party politics (which in a one
party town turns to party bullying).  I perceived specious arguments and
a disinterest in the good of the city.  Of course one irony for me is
that Barret, from my perspective, is more of a Democrat than an
Independence Party person or Republican.  He's just fiscally
responsibility and not beholden to the party apparecheks.  Or the
unions.  (More on the DFL CC meeting below.)

A great disappointment to me is that two minority (i.e., non-DFL)
Council Members voted to disempower the third minority CM on the
Council.  Further, many insurgents--who were supposedly running for
change and better governance--voted against him too.  Because he isn't a
Democrat?  Because he isn't nicy-nice enough?  

I've never been much of a manager but one thing I have learned is that
you should try to work with and give place to people you believe have
the skills to move the ball down the field for you and your
organization--even if you don't like them.  You indulge your personal
feelings at your and your organization's risk.  (I don't say I always
practice this, but now I see many "successful" political leaders
apparently don't either.)

In a word I think that Barret has a right to be disappointed.  Even
angry.  Many of us were looking forward to a new politics in Minneapolis
and then one of the more talented and (budget) experienced Council
members gets shut out (NO committee chairs?!) because of a party label. 
Really!  The self-seeking reform newcomers who voted against him should
be ashamed.

Now a bit more on that DFL Central Committee meeting.  I have to relate
a few particulars.  First, from Marie Hauser.  (Too bad DFL party line
voters passed over earnest, dedicated and knowledgeable Green Party
candidate Scott Vreeland!)  As I heard her she spoke against CM Lane as
follows.  She said that the Park Board first feared for $5 million they
needed (was that from the referendum bypassing deal they made with the
Old Regime?), but would likely get much of the money.  But there was
about $1.9 million that CM Lane was not sympathetic to.  Then she said
something to the following effect.  

When doorknocking she found the Somali men in Starbucks drinking coffee,
and the Somali women and children home in their high rise apartments,
isolated from the community.  The city would need to have park staff and
programs to integrate them into the community, and the budget to
accomplish it.  Then she said something to the effect that otherwise we
would have another generation of terrorists.  Yes, terrorists!  

I didn't realize so much was at stake in keeping CM Lane from being Ways
and Means Chair.  Disappointed to see she was elected Park Board Vice
Chair.  Hope she lets up some on the stereotyping.  And the heroic
leaps.

The next most disturbing presentation at the Central Committee meeting
was from my friend Brian Biele, who was representing labor
interests--Teamster DRIVE and I think Building Trades.  (He is Political
Director for Central Labor Council, I believe.)  

His unions did not want CM Lane as Chair because decisions come up at
Ways and Means on contracts and city expenditures that affect union
members, and CM Lane was perceived as hostile to the spending to keep
all those members employed.  

I guess Barret isn't the pushover that they would prefer--but do we
citizens want a pushover in a fiscal crisis?  (I say provide services
and build things when you want those services and things, not to create
a jobs program.  Otherwise you are redistributing income from one group
to another.  If that's what you want to do, do it through the front
door, not through unnecessary or wasteful programs.)  (Guess I won't get
to be Ways and Means Chair either.)

But the real disturbing part of Brian's presentation was when he
"rebutted" an email that CM Ostrow had earlier quoted from, from a
public employee union representative.  This poor Jill or Joan someone
had emailed that she regretted the "strong-arming" that was going on
over the Ways and Means Chairmanship.  Brian explained to us that this
woman had spoken out of turn, didn't have authorization to say anything
in her union capacity, and--this was the distressing part--would lose
her job for having sent the email.  Seemed CM Lane wasn't the only one
losing a job that night.

The rigidity and lack of freedom of conscience that some DFL Central
Committee members were proposing was tracking the rigidity and lack of
freedom of conscience that the union hierarchy was going to enforce.  I
wonder if some of the DFL CC members wished they had such "iron fist"
enforcement mechanisms over some of their minions and candidates.

BTW, CM Ostrow and several other CM's were present at the meeting on the
27th.  Both Ostrow and Scott Benson give excellent arguments against the
resolution (to keep a non-DFLer out of the Ways and Means
Chairpersonship).  And I should also note that the first count on the
resolution was 17 for, 16 against.  It was only on a recount that the
numbers changed to the 19-16.  So it was closer than you thought, and
obviously the true believers were more motivated to rally their troops
two days after Christmas.  So it was really close.

Yeah, the more I see of the internal workings of parties the less I want
to be involved in politics.  But then you would be allowing these people
to have easier access to the levers of power over you and me.  

I wish all the newly elected CM's had been there that night to see whom
they were siding with.  Green CM's too.  These are not your friends.

Alan Shilepsky
Downtown
Independence Party member
_______________________________________
Minneapolis Issues Forum - A Civil City Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy
Post messages to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest option, and more:
http://e-democracy.org/mpls

Reply via email to