[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

> Before you respond with a "knee jerk" retort, please remember that she did not have 
>mace, tasers, leaded batons (ever been exposed to hand to hand combat? do you know 
>how easy it is to dis-arm a person with a simple lead filled baton?).
>
> A number of officers armed with the means to dis-arm felons, especially in concerted 
>effort, or, with overwhelming physical presence, can not take down an individual  
>armed with non projectile, minimal threat weaponry?? How much protection does this 
>kind of combatant offer you in confrontation with anything? Seems to me that they are 
>decidedly  un-skilled at policing. Either that, or they are impervious to the wanton 
>destruction of human life in the name of protecting, or serving, any interest but 
>their own.

And...

Robert Schmid wrote:

> Thank you for saying this.  I am familiar with some of the techniques that
> could have prevented this debacle, even though I am unable to use them.  I
> happen know that the police department has in the past received training
> from at least one instructor who teaches forms which specifically involve
> machetes and other weapons of varying lengths.

I once read an article in the NYT theorizing that the reason that people are
so polite in the South is because there are consequences for being rude.
It has always struck me (no pun intended) as interesting that people in
Minnesota sometimes act in ways that would put them at risk of bodily
harm or death on the streets in L.A.  It might be that people act so inappropriately
here because there are no consequences for such behavior; that people here are
not as well aquatinted with street violence or violence in general.  I mean how else
can someone believe that you can take away a machete from someone
without suffering an injury?

A number of years ago, when I was still into such things, I had a martial arts
teacher who had been in the special forces during Vietnam.  He had also
been a self-defense instructor in the military, had been an consultant for
movies, written books on the subject, and so on.  We were having a conversation
about knife fighting once and he mentioned that he had never been in a knife fight
in which he hadn't been cut.  I believe that people who have never been in life
threatening situations just don't understand the chaos, unpredictability, and
surrealness that is inherent in such situations. I don't think that they can
understand that, depending on the length of the machete, a person could
strike within a range of six feet within a 1/2 second or in a couple more seconds
within 12 to 14 feet.  Secondly, how good are you with a handgun?  I know that in
controlled conditions I can usually hit a target the size of a person, but not
always.  I also know that in emergencies I sometimes shake a little.  So, I'm a
little incredulous when people suggest that police can easily shoot someone
in the leg.  Why not suggest shooting the machete out of his hand?  They
do it in the movies.

I'm not sure if the police did everything that they could to prevent this
shooting, I don't have enough information to judge; I still have a few
questions that need to be answered.  But, I will tell you for sure that
if I was within 20 feet of a crazy person with a machete and they started
running at me, I shoot, multiple times, end of story.

Michael Atherton
Prospect Park

_______________________________________
Minneapolis Issues Forum - A Civil City Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy
Post messages to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest option, and more:
http://e-democracy.org/mpls

Reply via email to