Many in the hospitality industry take this subject seriously.  I want to share a policy that is used by TGI Friday's (including the one on Hennepin Avenue downtown which should qualify this as a Minneapolis issue)- I do not work for Friday's but have many friends that wait tables, bartend or manage for Fridays throughout the Metro area.
Friday's policy is simple- "If you are under 50, you are going to be carded". 
Friday's uses their own 'decoys'- most are over 21 and some are nearing AARP age.  The 'decoy' comes up to the bar or is seated at a table and orders a drink- if the server or bartender fails to ask for an ID, the 'decoy' reaches into their pocket and gives the negligent employee a 'green card'- GOTCHA!- employee is fired on the spot- no ifs, and or buts- doesn't finish the shift- goes Bye-Bye!  To make sure that everyone in the restaurant knows the importance of this as a company policy from the management down, if there are 3 'green cards' given out in a particular store within a year, the General Manager is also fired- once again no ifs, ands or buts- a potentially successful, good-paying career with a Fortune 500 company down the drain.
Many establishments in the liquor industry today interpret the law to say "over 21 AND with a valid ID"- not one of the two conditions, but both.
I have seen some guests at Fridays get upset with the policy but I also see a majority of repeat guests that readily volunteer their ID as they are ordering their drinks.  Doesn't make any difference how old you are or how many times you have come into a particular restaurant- if the person serving you doesn't recognize you (ie: has never waited on you, maybe new employee, doesn't recognize you with your new hairdo or after you shaved your beard off) be prepared to show an ID.
Having worked in the hospitality industry in the past, I think this is a good policy.  It doesn't discriminate against anyone since everyone is being carded.  And I would be willing to bet when the MPD 'decoys' come into the Fridays at the City Center, they go home with an empty net.
It's just part of doing business in the liquor industry today.  The industry is getting used to it and so should their clientele.
Ron Lischeid
Windom
(One advantage to having a bad haircut and a beard is people seldom forget my face- but I still carry my DL with my AARP card- and am flattered when I am asked)
 
----- Original Message -----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, April 23, 2002 8:02 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Mpls] Liquor License Enforcement Procedures
 
I don't know if this topic has come up before.  I am
looking for advice or information about Mpls. police
liquor license enforcement.

My friend owns a small ethnic restaurant in S. Mpls.
Their revenue is predominately from food, but they offer
service of beer, wine and liquor, and have a small bar
that seats 8.  I have been there hundreds of times and
never seen them serve a minor or someone visibly
intoxicated.  The police have sent in “decoys” to test
their carding procedures 4 times in the last 22 months,
and they failed 3 times (and passed once) and are facing
a suspension of their license.  These are good, hard-
working, honest people.  I’d be willing to bet these
were the only instances of under-age service during that
period, it just does not often happen there.  Two times
the servers asked for ID but calculated the age
incorrectly; one time the manager (and owner’s sister)
came upon someone at the bar at an odd hour, and served
him a beer without checking I.D., all dumb mistakes.
They were fined $1500 per offense (the restaurant paid
and provided legal representation) and individuals were
charged with gross misdemeanors serving alcohol to a
minor.  The manager spent a week in court and had the
charges dropped.  The city has said they intend to retry
her case.

The city attorney says their job is to “aggressively
prosecute all crimes that occur in the city”; apparently
not to work constructively with citizens and business
owners to ensure compliance in a way that doesn’t
threaten their livelihoods.

The city council regulatory services committee is
Biernat, Niziolek, Colvin-Roy, Zerby, Zimmermann and
Johnson.  I really don’t know what their role is in
defining enforcement procedures.  I called the police
asking about enforcement procedures, and they just
referred me to legal statutes.  The enforcement doesn’t
seem fair.  I have heard they don’t send decoys to test
the metrodome, for example, although I don’t know if
this is true and don’t really know how to find out.  I
have heard of similar stories from other small
restaurants.

It seems to me they could start by observing a
restaurant's business procedures to see if they serve
minors or visibly intoxicated patrons before they try to
trick them into serving a minor.  Or even help them with
staff training materials, a sign with a birthdate
reminder, etc.  Does anyone have advice or experience?
My friend's restaurant is facing serious, and in my
opinion undeserved, hardship.

Nikki Carlson
Linden Hills

_______________________________________
Minneapolis Issues Forum - A Civil City Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy
Post messages to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest option, and more:
http://e-democracy.org/mpls

Reply via email to