Just a clarification here: If you're wondering what the heck Don is talking about, Joe's post did not get to the list for technical reasons. We're dealing with this one off-list, where hopefully it will stay.
David Brauer List manager on 5/9/02 12:15 PM, Don Jorovsky at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > List, > > I think we can all agree that it is unwise > (as well as a violation of list rules) to > publicly post private e-mails. It has a > chilling effect on freedom of speech. In > addition, there are differences between > what you might say in private and in public. > My posts to this list are usually quite > reasonable (well, you might not agree with > my opinions, but the way they're worded is > usually reasonable), but what one says in > a private e-mail is more like a conversation > one might have in private, in which opinions > are more free-wheeling. Therefore, I find > it quite objectionable that Mr. Barisonzi > has once again violated both list rules > and general ethics and etiquette. Our > excellent List Manager has asked that we > not debate list rules on the list, so the > only reason I'm sending this to all is that > if I did not, everyone would probably start > debating the substance of my private e-mail, > as if I had sent it to the list, and since > I did not, I'm asking that we not debate it. > > Don Jorovsky > > > > > _________________________________________________________________ > Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: http://mobile.msn.com > > _______________________________________ > Minneapolis Issues Forum - A Civil City Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy > Post messages to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest option, and more: > http://e-democracy.org/mpls > _______________________________________ Minneapolis Issues Forum - A Civil City Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy Post messages to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest option, and more: http://e-democracy.org/mpls
