David Brauer wrote:

>Linda Mack has another fine, fine piece about how Block E was
>reconfigured to lose many of its public improvements. (I say this as a
>jealous competitor but grateful citizen.) The story today connects the
>dots on how the city's development system failings allowed Block E's
>foibles to get through.http://www.startribune.com/stories/462/3130390.html
>
As I have listened to builders and repairs of things like buildings, 
streets, etc., Mack has accurately described the status quo.
What I have observed, living in different cities across this country, is 
that cities do make "reforms" to systems. However, they do not sweep 
away the older, underlying forms entirely. Maybe the press of work gets 
in the way. The result is that the older the city, the more layered and 
convoluted the systems of change become. (Dickens' hilarious 
descriptions of the English Court of Chancery come to mind.) My utter 
frustration and failure with the Manhattan Island bureaucracy in trying 
to get a fence installed on a playing field was the nightmare that 
exemplified the status quo to me. The bollux Minneapolis created for 
itself when it changed the system for assessing water use is an 
outstanding example of failure to forsee a huge snafu. The question 
apparently not asked was "What's our fallback position if this doesn't 
work?" Or, 'how do we get the bills out next month if we've screwed 
something up?'

The other question that comes to mind when thinking of instituting the 
changes suggested in      the  Report is this: if Planning and MCDA are 
combined, don't we automatically create a conflict of interest?

WizardMarks, Central

>
>
>
>_______________________________________
>Minneapolis Issues Forum - A Civil City Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy
>Post messages to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest option, and more:
>http://e-democracy.org/mpls
>


_______________________________________
Minneapolis Issues Forum - A Civil City Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy
Post messages to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest option, and more:
http://e-democracy.org/mpls

Reply via email to