In regards to making the bars and restaurants in the Twin Cities smoke-free,
as far as I know, that option already exists. As it stands, any bar or
restaurant owner can identify their establishment as smoke-free, with simply
the risk of scaring smokers away from their business. This was pretty much
the case when I visited a friend in Santa Cruz, Calif. There was an
ordinance banning smoking in bars and restaurants, but those who wanted to
smoke knew which businesses would turn a blind eye to their habit. Since the
city was pretty much willing to do the same, there was no need to waste time
and money with bureaucracy on passing the no-smoking clause. For the same
reason, the Twin Cities' governments should avoid dedicating their resources
to an issue of this nature and should leave the decision up to individual
business owners. That way, any downfall in their profits can be attributed
to their own decision as opposed to a city-ordered mandate.
Tim Neuenschwander
Marcy-Holmes
_________________________________________________________________
Help STOP SPAM with the new MSN 8 and get 2 months FREE*
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail
_______________________________________
Minneapolis Issues Forum - A City-focused Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy
Post messages to: mailto:mpls@;mnforum.org
Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest, and more: http://e-democracy.org/mpls
- Re: [Mpls] Smoke-Free Cities Already Possible Tim Neuenschwander
- Re: [Mpls] Smoke-Free Cities Already Possible David Wilson
- Re: [Mpls] Smoke-Free Cities Already Possible MJ Mueller
