What is frustrating to continue to hear from all of my
anti-war advocates on the forum is the insinuation the
United States is equally corrupt in its morals as the
current Iraqi regime.  I suspect this comes from the
belief of moral relativism, which is a completely
self-contradicting philosophy.  However, I will spare
you my philosophical banter and stick more directly to
whether the United States is equally horrible as Iraq.

I will be the first to admit the United States has not
lived up to the ideals it claims 100% of the time. 
However, let�s look at Iraq vs. the United States in
one important area: freedom of expression.  This
conversation we�ve been having about whether it�s
germane for the Minneapolis City Council to speak on
the war with Iraq simply would not be happening in
Baghdad.  You know as well as I that dissent in Iraq
is simply not tolerated.  If we were discussing on the
Baghdad Issues Forum whether the Baghdad City Council
should speak against Saddam, every proponent of
opposing Saddam would be tortured and/or killed. 
Please tell me, when is the last time the FBI showed
up at your house to torture you because you spoke
against the national government?  When is the last
time the CIA showed up to torture your children with
you watching because you dared say the US government
has made mistakes?  When is the last time you had to
sign your name on your ballot for president so the
National Guard knew who was voting against the
government�s choice of president?

Furthermore, when is the last time the United States
government openly used chemical or biological weapons
against a whole people because it served to terrorize
people into submission (and please keep the answer to
weapons similar to what Saddam used on the Kurds)?

**Despite failures we see in hindsight (which, as is
said, is always 20/20)**, the United States has made
far more attempt to recognize the worth of all people
and bring justice to all people than will ever be seen
under Saddam.  The United States has also brought more
freedom to other countries than will ever be seen by
Saddam.  It saddens me that so many take their
freedoms so lightly so as to try to make the very
country that allows such freedom as horrible as the
truly horrible ones.

As far as the 50 other cities that have jumped on the
bandwagon of political correctness to vote for
anti-war resolutions, I bluntly tell you I don�t care.
 Whether it�s 50 or 500, none of these cities should
be spending their valuable time playing debate club. 
There are streets to police, fires to put out, parade
permits to issue, and many other relevant issues for
city councils to deal with.  Every Council Member and
Mayor is completely free to express their opinions
independently, as R.T. Rybak has and will likely
continue to do.  But, whether we knew we were going to
war or not when the Council was elected, nobody
expected City Councils to speak on national issues.  I
again repeat this is why we elect US House members and
Senators.

Consider this theoretical twist on the argument that
we�re all so interrelated:  If city governments should
speak out on national issues, then why shouldn�t
national governments speak out on local issues
(excepting constitutional arguments)?  Maybe we should
expect Congress to weigh in every time the City
Council wants to issue a parade permit.  Certainly an
argument could be made that Congress has a vested
interest in assuring city streets are well used by
American citizens.  Wouldn�t it be an interesting
twist to have the likes of Jesse Helms debating
whether a parade permit should be issued for the Gay
Pride Parade?  Is this what you really want?  Is this
really a wise use of Congress' time?

Let�s face it: war is a terrible thing.  I remind you,
though, history has shown appeasement usually if not
always fails.  When Europe tried to appease Hitler,
six million Jews died.  Do we really want a repeat of
this?  I pray not.  If we can free Iraqi citizens from
tyranny and horrible oppression, if we can remove a
horrible terrorist before he successfully terrorizes
more people, why do we sit and wait?  Isn�t that just
as immoral?  Who on this list had a signature on their
posts talking about the hottest places in hell are
reserved for those who stand by and do nothing in the
face of evil?

In closing, if we want to quote from the Bible, let me
quote this: �Remember those who are in prison, as
though in prison with them; and those who are
ill-treated, since you also are in the body� (Hebrews
13:3).  The Iraqi people remain in a prison.  And, so
long as Saddam remains, we all remain in a prison of
fear and terror over what he�ll do next- all based on
his past actions.

Gary Bowman
Audubon Park


=====
"Wars are, of course, as a rule to be avoided; but they are far better than certain 
kinds of peace.'' 
--Theodore Roosevelt, 26th President

__________________________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now.
http://mailplus.yahoo.com

TEMPORARY REMINDER:
1. Send all posts in plain-text format.
2. Cut as much of the post you're responding to as possible.

________________________________

Minneapolis Issues Forum - A City-focused Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy
Post messages to: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest, and more: http://e-democracy.org/mpls

Reply via email to