I feel an anti-war resolution would not do a tremendous amount of good. It also isn't 
likely, by itself, to do any great harm.  One way in which it COULD do harm is if the 
fight over a trivial question leads to such bad feelings that purely LOCAL problems 
are hard to solve due to a spirit of animosity.  There are a million ways to fight 
against a knuckle-headed president who won't listent to reason. The anti-war 
resolution is among the least important, so don't give up the community spirit needed 
to solve OUR problems merely to gain the upper hand in this war issue.

I think it is funny that people are talking about this matter of depicting the holder 
of an opposing view as "craven" or worse.  I've watched American do that to the French 
for THEIR opposition to the war. Those eager for this war seem incapable of conceiving 
of any valid opposing view, such as the ones that the French and other Europeans (and 
quite a few Arabs) have.

Yet, back here in Minneapolis, our local war-proponents find themselves in the same 
fix the Frend are in. Against a resolution and upset at the way that is interpreted.  
Guess it proves were all humans, doesn't it?

Too bad, by the way, that what may very well be a temporary fiscal fix is being used 
as a pretext for some kind of "revolution" in government.  Had they suggested these 
radical changes in Bill Clinton's last year, they would have been hooted out of the 
place. Their ideas on the "proper role of government" only make any rational sense in 
a very sick economy.  So I'm asking myself, do these people NEED a sick economy to 
feel they are finally right?  That's a pretty poor philosophy that only guides you 
when things are at their worst. Reminds me of the people who went through the Great 
Depression and spent the rest of their natural lives getting ready for its return.

By the way, I've known a great number of people who came out of the Depression, 
shuddering at the experience, but more determined than ever to enjoy the REST of their 
lives since a decade was stolen from them.  That would be my suggestion here.  
Whatever the true cause of these sick years in our economic history, they should NOT 
define in any general way how a society needs to function.  What made sense before 
makes the same sense now.  Just because I am unemployed for a few months doesnt mean 
once I get a paying job, I go on acting as if I'm unemployed.  I do save for a future 
rainy day, but I certainly also spend money if I have it.  To not do so is ridiculous. 
I think Vicky and a few others think that government spending is a mistake that should 
never be repeated.

Well, short and long, that's a foolish philosophy.  If it isnt, write Bush and tell 
him to shut down all his expensive new projects. I think what we learned in the 1990s 
is that prosperity is very possible and sustainable, but what you CAN'T do is make 
investment decisions that don't make sense and never DID make sense. The sober heads 
never bought the irrationality that finally took over.

Here in Minneapolis, we seem to be wanting to trade one irrationality (show projects) 
for another (cutting education and other vital public goods).  How about trading 
irrationality for rationality?  There is no excuse when funds are short to forego 
vital home repairs. Well, society has to do the same thing.  It has to TEMPORARILY 
tighten its belt and defer discretionary projects to a time when things are more flush.


--------------
Jim Mork--Cooper

"Save yourself from this corrupt generation....All who believed were together and had 
all things in common; they would sell their possessions and goods and distribute the 
proceeds to all, as any had need". Acts 2:4-45

"The disciples determined that according to their ability, each would send relief to 
the believers".  Acts 11:29

"From each according to his ability...to each according to his need."  Karl Marx
Get your free Web-based E-mail at http://www.startribune.com/stribmail

TEMPORARY REMINDER:
1. Send all posts in plain-text format.
2. Cut as much of the post you're responding to as possible.

________________________________

Minneapolis Issues Forum - A City-focused Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy
Post messages to: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest, and more: http://e-democracy.org/mpls

Reply via email to