Regarding Keith Reitman's characterization of the
Access Project ramps as "Urban Avoidance Ramps" (quite
brilliant, I must say) 

Scott Persons claims:

The reason there is an exit ramp to 28th street 
is to relieve congestion on Lake Street that the new
ramps bring, it also keeps the delivery truck traffic
off of Lake Street.  

David Piehl asks:

So, this is an outright admission that the new ramps
will bring congestion, and that truck traffic will
move to 28th Street, a residential street.  Haven't
project promoters been saying all along that the
objective is to get traffic out of the neighborhoods
and on to Lake Street?  How will the neighborhoods
gain if we see increased truck traffic???

Scott continues:
It's quite a simple equation really, more customers
means more business, or the equally successful
equation capital begets capital.  

David Piehl writes:
Whew!  That assumes way to much to be relevant.  The
implicit assumption is that the traffic will indeed
consist of "customers", which would then presumably
translate into "business".  Lake Street is already
very busy; why do some businesses thrive, and others
fail in the same environment?  Did the ramps at West
Broadway translate into more customers and more
business for the Target that had to be shuttered?? 
Since the traffic has been at 35th and 36th for 40
years, did they develop into successful business
nodes?  

And what's this about "capital begets capital"?  I
don't believe it's true, and have to say that after
all of my graduate level economics courses and time
with Fortune 500 companies, I can't think of anything
to substantiate that thought.  Even if it were true,
does that mean we NEED or WANT whatever capital
investment is offered?  Should we build a huge jail,
or a nuclear power plant in Lyndale neighborhood? 
That would certainly be capital investment!  

Scott categorizes Keith's comments as follows:

Sounds to me like you may be suffering
from a case of infrastructure investment envy, just a
guess.

David Piehl asks:

And, maybe Scott is suffering from infrastructure
investment addiction?  

Come on folks, all development and all investment is
not by definition a good thing!  Some is appropriate,
some is not - it all depends on the impact; who bears
the costs and benefits, and in what ratio.

David Piehl
Central








__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month!
http://sbc.yahoo.com
TEMPORARY REMINDER:
1. Don't feed the troll! Ignore obvious flame-bait.
2. If you don't like what's being discussed here, don't complain - change the subject 
(Mpls-specific, of course.)

________________________________

Minneapolis Issues Forum - A City-focused Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy
Post messages to: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest, and more: http://e-democracy.org/mpls

Reply via email to