I don't get it either. The negative response on the Mpls-Issues listserv
seems to me to be a "rush-to-judgement" without any evaluation criteria.
Let me see. The reasons I've read are:
global capitalism
high salaries
private sector experience
fiscal problems
working for Smith Parker.
So for those of you who oppose these appointments, what are the criteria
that you are using to from your opinions?
Like Claude Rains in the film CASABLANCA, "I'm shocked! Shocked!"
David Wilson
Loring Park
TEMPORARY REMINDER:
1. Don't feed the troll! Ignore obvious flame-bait.
2. If you don't like what's being discussed here, don't complain - change the subject
(Mpls-specific, of course.)
________________________________
Minneapolis Issues Forum - A City-focused Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy
Post messages to: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest, and more: http://e-democracy.org/mpls
