Emilie Quast wrote:

C. Nompelis: "Suppose two lesbian couples wanted to buy a house
together SNIP Can they not do that?"


Sure: get a variance.

WM: And if you don't care to be outed? Scuse me, not a good idea. The whole point is that one's marital status is no one's business but the tax man.

six bedrooms: assuming each bedroom only was rented to one person and no
one doubled up with a friend to save more money, if each renter had one
friend over, that's 12 people in the house, probably with 6 TVs going or
VCRs or other loud electronic noises.  Maybe one of them is playing an
instrument loudly enough to be able to hear himself, too.  And they will be
talking to each other, loudly enough to be heard over the electronics.
Maybe each has a car, and maybe each friend has a car, and maybe one or two
of them calls a second friend to come on over, and parking is limited (by
ordinance) to three spaces on the lot for each dwelling unit.

Except that the law allows only four "unrelated persons" in my area, you have just described my home in terms of who may arrive. We have never had a noise complaint, nor would we warrant one. If the problem of a house is noise, submit a noise complaint. One's lifestyle should not have to pass muster with the MCDA-supported neighborhood group. Our household calls itself a family and calls itself queer, since it spans three generations of members (and de olde heade was outvoted 3 to 1 with the suggestion that we call it the Oakland Home for the Bewildered--the younger generations assume that bewildered is not a permanent state. Ha!)

Now picture yourself living next door or across the street and trying to
get to sleep because you have to get up early in the morning.  Or your 2
year old keeps waking up because of the noise.  OR your geriatric neighbor
who has a heart condition can't get to sleep at all, or, or, or,

WM: Nuisance laws are in place to deal with all those annoyances. The civil liberties issue is that the variance assumes that marital bliss is the norm and others are not normative. When the cost of city housing is outrageous, those less well off double up to stretch the dollars and avoid becoming homeless.

THAT is what we are trying to avoid.

WM: Then use the laws put in place--the nuisance laws, domestic abuse laws, whatever is appropriate, don't set yourself up or let the city set you up as judge and jury on lifestyle. The argument that being loud and obnoxious is an anti-establishment statement is so much bushwah. The argument that the neighbors get to lord it over one's lifestyle is bushwa too.

We don't worry about domestic arrangements in Como unless we can hear them
in the next house.


WM: Hoisted on your own petard, Emily. If a household is out of control, it is not their marital status which creates the hoo-hah. The code variance requirement assumes that unless there is a Pater Familius in the household, there will not be order. That is demonstrably not the case. I cite convents and abbys which are anal about order, quiet, discipline, etc. Those trained by nuns, particularly, usually display some components of those disciplines whatever their lifestyle.

WizardMarks, Central

(probably named after Central High School which has morphed into Richard Green Central School)


________________________________


Minneapolis Issues Forum - A City-focused Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy
Post messages to: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe, Un-subscribe, etc. at: http://e-democracy.org/mpls



REMINDERS:
1. Think a member has violated the rules? Email the list manager at [EMAIL PROTECTED] before continuing it on the list. 2. Don't feed the troll! Ignore obvious flame-bait.
________________________________


Minneapolis Issues Forum - A City-focused Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy
Post messages to: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe, Un-subscribe, etc. at: http://e-democracy.org/mpls

Reply via email to