One question Mr. Johnson, do you have children that are failing in the Minneapolis 
Public School System?
Andrea Jenkins
Bryant

-----Original Message-----
From: Chris Johnson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 08, 2003 1:11 PM
To: Mpls Forum
Subject: [Mpls] David Jennings withdraws from superintendent job


"David Jennings took his name out of consideration today for the job of 
Minneapolis school superintendent." --  
http://www.startribune.com/stories/1592/4142982.html

This is sad news in my view.

First, since when should a very small group of people with loud voices 
get the privilege of approving or disapproving the hiring by elected 
boards such as the school board?  This is tyranny of othe minority over 
the majority.  If this kind of bullying becomes prevalent, we will never 
have reasonable or timely decisions made by public bodies.

Second, the chief executive of many large public institutions with 
multiple funding sources are chosen more for their political connections 
and ability to lobby and persuade than for their ability to operate the 
organization precisely because in such organizations getting the revenue 
to do the job is crucial, and there are plenty of other executives and 
managers who will have and use their operational skills to make sure the 
organization is run well.  Without the money, the whole organization 
suffers.  (I'll offer as an example the University of Colorada system 
where the President of the University is primarily the chief lobbyist 
and public relations person, and is not involved in the day to day 
running of the system -- by design.  Without the president and his staff 
meeting and persuading the various funding sources, primarily the state 
legislature, the revenue stream would be much smaller and less reliable.)

The Minneapolis Public Schools are in exactly the situation of needing 
funding from multiple sources, most of which are politically controlled, 
and most of which comes from the state legislature.  David Jennings is 
clearly head and shoulders above any other potential candidate for the 
superintendent's job in his ability to connect with the legislature. 

He's also an intelligent person who is intimately familiar with the MPS 
system, having worked there the past  21 months in the number 2 
leadership position.  Just as Jennings acted as superintendent Carol 
Johnson's expert on operations, he could easily have selected someone to 
fill the number 2 position under him who was an expert on educational 
and instructional practices.  Both skills, and more, are needed to run 
the district properly.  Jennings has both the political clout and the 
operational skills.  That he does not have a Ph.D. or Ed.D is almost 
irrelevant.  In a small school district, that may be an important 
qualification because there won't be additional district management in 
which to find all of the skill necessary.  But at large disticts like 
MPS, that's not the case.  It could be argued that it would be 
impossible for one person to be well qualified in all the areas needed 
for such a large and complicated system.

Forcing Jennings out is throwing out the baby with the bathwater.  It's 
a bunch of self-important racists with a bogus sense of entitlement 
playing a new kind of "stealth" race card.

"You cannot cut the people out of the process!" they shouted.  Wrong.  
The people's chance to be part of the process was in voting for the 
school board members, and contacting them and Carol Johnson with their 
concerns prior to the decision.

Mob mentality is not part of the process.  Second-guessing the board's 
choice is not part of the process.  As long as the board followed the 
law, and it appears they did despite inflammatory rhetoric to the 
contrary, there is nothing wrong with making a choice without the 
public's approval.  In fact, that's generally a better way to conduct 
business if a board wants to accomplish anything.

Even if the board erred in some way in dotting the i's and crossing the 
t's of public meeting laws, that does not make Jennings a per se bad 
choice.  I happen to think he might be a good choice.  If he is not, we 
would see soon enough.

Chris Johnson
Fulton


REMINDERS:
1. Think a member has violated the rules? Email the list manager at [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
before continuing it on the list. 
2. Don't feed the troll! Ignore obvious flame-bait.
________________________________

Minneapolis Issues Forum - A City-focused Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy
Post messages to: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe, Un-subscribe, etc. at: http://e-democracy.org/mpls
REMINDERS:
1. Think a member has violated the rules? Email the list manager at [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
before continuing it on the list.
2. Don't feed the troll! Ignore obvious flame-bait.
________________________________

Minneapolis Issues Forum - A City-focused Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy
Post messages to: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe, Un-subscribe, etc. at: http://e-democracy.org/mpls

Reply via email to