So assuming the allegations are true, it sounds like Dyna saying it's OK to rape someone with a toilet plunger if they're a drug dealer or a member of a gang? I sure hope that's not the case.
But thinking rationally, such an assault is going to leave some physical evidence. Does anyone really think that might have been self-inflicted by the "perps" in order to take attention away from their alleged crimes? That seems like an awfully painful approach, especially considering how many on this list have lamented about drug dealers who get arrested are often back on the streets before anyone even notices they were ever gone. Why couldn't the cops just arrest the suspects and go from there? I think those who automatically jump down the throats of CUAPB or others who come forward with such charges are missing a point. The reason we even have an organization like CUAPB in Minneapolis is because there have been so many different incidents of police brutality over the years. Defenders of the cops like to trot out the "innocent before proven guilty" phrase. That works both ways. If the cops get the benefit of the doubt, so should those who allege police brutality, whether they are innocent victims or criminals. Mark Snyder Windom Park REMINDERS: 1. Think a member has violated the rules? Email the list manager at [EMAIL PROTECTED] before continuing it on the list. 2. Don't feed the troll! Ignore obvious flame-bait. ________________________________ Minneapolis Issues Forum - A City-focused Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy Post messages to: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Subscribe, Un-subscribe, etc. at: http://e-democracy.org/mpls
