Believe it or not, CUAPB doesn't want to get snowed so we investigate cases to the best of our ability before we put out any kind of public statement. That's why we did not put out a public statement until very late Tuesday night after our team had done it's preliminary work, despite being hounded by the media for a statement. Our team continued to investigate yesterday and has some information that even the media is not privy to.
I feel we have acted in a completely responsible manner. However, I personally can't say the same about Moss, Staten and company. It was the height of irresponsibility to bring a man straight from jail after such an ordeal and let him spill his guts to the media, thus possibly blowing any legal case he could have.
Michelle Gross Bryn Mawr
At 08:40 AM 10/16/03 -0500, Anne McCandless wrote:
I agree with Dyna (never thought I would say that, girl). Before I would
take Mr Porter's word that the sky is blue, I'd step outside and make sure.
How many of the people on this list, members of CUAPB included, would want to be convicted solely on Mr Porter and his buddies say so?
If, and I know this is going to be hard for some of you to imagine, but if Mr Porter's allegations are not true, what do you think the officers deserve to get? They have been accused, in public, named in the media and by their accuser of one of the most perverted acts one man can commit on another. If they did not do this, will all these people, including CUAPB, apologige as loudly and as publicly as they are now condemning them? Or will this act just be considered one of the risks of the job?
Anne McCandless Jordan
REMINDERS:
1. Think a member has violated the rules? Email the list manager at [EMAIL PROTECTED] before continuing it on the list. 2. Don't feed the troll! Ignore obvious flame-bait.
________________________________
Minneapolis Issues Forum - A City-focused Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy Post messages to: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Subscribe, Un-subscribe, etc. at: http://e-democracy.org/mpls
