I have just moved back into Minneapolis from Richfield where I was spoiled
by having single sort recycling, I must urge the city council to seriously
consider changing to a single sort (or at very least double sort) system.
In order for the average person to participate in a recycling system it must
be convenient, the present Minneapolis system is anything but, separating
and bagging the different types of recycling then getting threatening notes
if you make a mistake?  Come on, the less complex the better.

Dan McConnell
Longfellow

Message: 5
Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2004 12:12:51 -0600
From: Hal Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Minneapolis Issues Forum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [Mpls] Minneapolis recycling contract

The information I've read on this topic leads me to think that city
council should choose Eureka Recycling for the new contract. But I
suppose there are reasons--either practical or political--why the city
council would choose RecycleAmerica instead. Could someone on this list
suggest what those reasons might be? Thanks.

Hal Johnson
Seward

Mark Snyder wrote:

>I heard through the grapevine that the city council Transportation and
>Public Works committee is set to vote on a new recycling contract next
>Tuesday and the main contenders appear to be RecycleAmerica (Waste
>Management) and Eureka Recycling.
>
>Bids were reviewed by RW Beck and Dan Krivit and Associates and for those
>who like the details, you can download their report using this link.
>
>http://www.ci.minneapolis.mn.us/council/2004-meetings/20040116/docs/09_Resi
d
>ental_Recycling_Program.pdf
>
>If that monstrosity breaks on you, use this one:
>
>http://makeashorterlink.com/?D1F326217
>
>But, here is the short and sweet version:
>
>Processors pay the city for their recyclable materials, and then sort and
>sell it to other markets. Waste Management is offering the city a "fixed
>price" for the material, meaning they will never pay the city less or more
>than this price no matter what the markets are paying them for the
material.
>Sounds safe, but the catch is that everything ABOVE that price, Waste
>Management keeps as profit.
>
>Markets were paying significantly more than Waste Management's price last
>year (as can be seen in Table 2 of the report by the number of times Eureka
>is listed as the "best price"), and all indicators suggest that the markets
>for recycled material (especially paper, a big component of the Minneapolis
>recycling stream) are going to continue to rise.
>
>Because Eureka is a non-profit, they are offering the city 100% of the
>revenues. That money can then be reinvested into the recycling program
>helping to cover cost for collection and expand waste reduction programs,
>making recycling much more sustainable and successful for Minneapolis.
>Eureka believes that Minneapolis residents should benefit from the revenues
>made through their recycling efforts.
>
>Another concern with Waste Management is their decision-making for managing
>recyclables is based solely on their own bottom line whereas Eureka's is
>based on ensuring the highest and best use for the recyclables we go to all
>that effort to separate and collect. That means that while Eureka will make
>sure your glass bottles get used to make other glass products, Waste
>Management is happy to use crushed glass in landfill cover.
>
>Is that what you spent all that time washing and sorting bottles for?
>
>The T&PW committee members are Sandra Colvin Roy (chair), Scott Benson,
>Barret Lane, Robert Lilligren, Gary Schiff and Dean Zimmermann.
>
>Mark Snyder
>Windom Park
>
>

REMINDERS:
1. Think a member has violated the rules? Email the list manager at [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
before continuing it on the list. 
2. Don't feed the troll! Ignore obvious flame-bait.

For state and national discussions see: http://e-democracy.org/discuss.html
For external forums, see: http://e-democracy.org/mninteract
________________________________

Minneapolis Issues Forum - A City-focused Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy
Post messages to: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe, Un-subscribe, etc. at: http://e-democracy.org/mpls

Reply via email to