Dan McGuire says: > I most definitely agree that the discussion should be broader. However, > the important issue is not whether the decisions of 20 years ago were sound > but whether the proposals that will be presumably voted on in ten days are > good for Minneapolis. The evidence to support closing Kenny, for instance, > is scant. There are plenty of alternatives that would very likely make much > more sense and save even more cents in the both the short term and long > term.
What would those be? And on what basis do you call evidence to support closing Kenny scant? Genuinely asking, not belittling. David Brauer Kingfield REMINDERS: 1. Think a member has violated the rules? Email the list manager at [EMAIL PROTECTED] before continuing it on the list. 2. Don't feed the troll! Ignore obvious flame-bait. For state and national discussions see: http://e-democracy.org/discuss.html For external forums, see: http://e-democracy.org/mninteract ________________________________ Minneapolis Issues Forum - A City-focused Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy Post messages to: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Subscribe, Un-subscribe, etc. at: http://e-democracy.org/mpls
