All,

So, I am so intrigued with this story-- that even though no one else has
clamored in, I will respond to my own post! <smile>  

A memo ordered destroyed that was never destroyed? Two officers come to
McManus with information and are put on administrative leave?
Investigation by the BCA? The highest ranking women on the force, who
just happened to be the lead internal candidate for the position, put on
leave? Who is now represented by Former Federal Attorney Lillehaug?
Where is the former chief in this?

I was just listening to McManus on MPR say that he commended Cpt. Martin
and Lt. Carlson for "proving they were men."

Slip of the tongue? Just an expression? Reflecting an underlying bias? 

There is clearly something going on here that hasn't come out in the
paper yet. At least we know the way to earn the chief's respect is to
prove you are a man.


Joseph Barisonzi
Willard-Hay
 




REMINDERS:
1. Think a member has violated the rules? Email the list manager at [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
before continuing it on the list. 
2. Don't feed the troll! Ignore obvious flame-bait.

For state and national discussions see: http://e-democracy.org/discuss.html
For external forums, see: http://e-democracy.org/mninteract
________________________________

Minneapolis Issues Forum - A City-focused Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy
Post messages to: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe, Un-subscribe, etc. at: http://e-democracy.org/mpls

Reply via email to