Chris Johnson wrote:
Theodore Wirth's vision, and that of the Park Board in the first half of the 20th 
century, for those concessions was to provide a service to the public and an 
opportunity for employment for neighborhood youth, and the learning and other 
community benefits that go with it. Like neighborhood schools and neighborhood 
libraries, neighborhood parks become part of and support the community fabric. There 
was a park within 6 blocks of every residence in the city, so that all children and 
families would have easy access to them -- not just the families with soccer moms 
willing and able to act as limousine services to such inaccessible places as the Ft. 
Snelling soccer fields now leased by the Park Board.

Until the early 1980s, the Park Board grew its own plants and trees at its own 
greenhouses and nursery, providing yet another pair of locations for a large number of 
city youth to have good experiences and gainful summer employment.

So, do you want billboards on park benches, Dairy Queen signs over concessions, and 
other privatization and commercialization of our parks? Or do you want the community- 
and neighborhood-oriented parks that our predecessors left us? 


Mark Anderson replies:
What are you saying here, Chris?  You wax on about Theodore Wirth's vision for our 
parks, and I was waiting for your climax: where you explain the grave danger to this 
utopian vision.  Apparently this is all about giving DQ the concession at Lake 
Harriet?  That gives up the community-oriented parks we have?  

I don't understand, Chris.  I think the main result of out-sourcing the concessions 
would be that the park system could collect more cash than their current inefficient 
and poorly managed yields.  At the top of your e-mail you basically accuse the Park 
Board of hiding theft at the concession stands.  Then at the bottom, you defame the 
Board for giving up day-to-day management.  I'd think you would celebrate taking the 
management away from the Board.

Also, why do you have an emotional attraction to the concession stands being run by 
the Park Board?  I can understand your concern with losing the benefits of our park 
system.  Mpls does have a great park system.  I would miss it too, if we lost all the 
green space.  But the concession stands?  Who cares who runs them?  They are already 
the exception to the green space, perhaps an unavoidable blot on the rest of the 
parks.  But if we have to have them, let's at least make money on them.

Mark V Anderson
Bancroft
REMINDERS:
1. Think a member has violated the rules? Email the list manager at [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
before continuing it on the list.
2. Don't feed the troll! Ignore obvious flame-bait.

For state and national discussions see: http://e-democracy.org/discuss.html
For external forums, see: http://e-democracy.org/mninteract
________________________________

Minneapolis Issues Forum - A City-focused Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy
Post messages to: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe, Un-subscribe, etc. at: http://e-democracy.org/mpls

Reply via email to