The questions seem to be:

- What is the value of having a "non-commercial" vendor operate the vending
service? Does the non-commercial vendor offer a value that contributes to
the idyllic community atmosphere of the park experience?  Personally, I see
value in receiving the service from a non-commercial vendor. It feels good.
Reminds me of time past. Helps differentiate the experience from a
commercial one.

- Is the park board capable of operating a profitable (or least not money
loosing) non-commercial vending service? If they are incapable of doing
this, I guess it really doesn't matter. Have they proven capable in other
venues? I honestly ask this question because I don't have any idea of the
answer. 

Steve Kotvis
Kenwood
 
 > Chris Johnson wrote:
> Theodore Wirth's vision, and that of the Park Board in the first half of the
> 20th century, for those concessions was to provide a service to the public and
> an opportunity for employment for neighborhood youth, and the learning and
> other community benefits that go with it. Like neighborhood schools and
> neighborhood libraries, neighborhood parks become part of and support the
> community fabric. There was a park within 6 blocks of every residence in the
> city, so that all children and families would have easy access to them -- not
> just the families with soccer moms willing and able to act as limousine
> services to such inaccessible places as the Ft. Snelling soccer fields now
> leased by the Park Board.
> 
> Until the early 1980s, the Park Board grew its own plants and trees at its own
> greenhouses and nursery, providing yet another pair of locations for a large
> number of city youth to have good experiences and gainful summer employment.
> 
> So, do you want billboards on park benches, Dairy Queen signs over
> concessions, and other privatization and commercialization of our parks? Or do
> you want the community- and neighborhood-oriented parks that our predecessors
> left us? 
> 
> 
> Mark Anderson replies:
> What are you saying here, Chris?  You wax on about Theodore Wirth's vision for
> our parks, and I was waiting for your climax: where you explain the grave
> danger to this utopian vision.  Apparently this is all about giving DQ the
> concession at Lake Harriet?  That gives up the community-oriented parks we
> have?  
> 
> I don't understand, Chris.  I think the main result of out-sourcing the
> concessions would be that the park system could collect more cash than their
> current inefficient and poorly managed yields.  At the top of your e-mail you
> basically accuse the Park Board of hiding theft at the concession stands.
> Then at the bottom, you defame the Board for giving up day-to-day management.
> I'd think you would celebrate taking the management away from the Board.
> 
> Also, why do you have an emotional attraction to the concession stands being
> run by the Park Board?  I can understand your concern with losing the benefits
> of our park system.  Mpls does have a great park system.  I would miss it too,
> if we lost all the green space.  But the concession stands?  Who cares who
> runs them?  They are already the exception to the green space, perhaps an
> unavoidable blot on the rest of the parks.  But if we have to have them, let's
> at least make money on them.
> 
> Mark V Anderson
> Bancroft
> REMINDERS:
> 1. Think a member has violated the rules? Email the list manager at
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] before continuing it on the list.
> 2. Don't feed the troll! Ignore obvious flame-bait.
> 
> For state and national discussions see: http://e-democracy.org/discuss.html
> For external forums, see: http://e-democracy.org/mninteract
> ________________________________
> 
> Minneapolis Issues Forum - A City-focused Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy
> Post messages to: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subscribe, Un-subscribe, etc. at: http://e-democracy.org/mpls

-- 
Steve Kotvis

REMINDERS:
1. Think a member has violated the rules? Email the list manager at [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
before continuing it on the list. 
2. Don't feed the troll! Ignore obvious flame-bait.

For state and national discussions see: http://e-democracy.org/discuss.html
For external forums, see: http://e-democracy.org/mninteract
________________________________

Minneapolis Issues Forum - A City-focused Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy
Post messages to: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe, Un-subscribe, etc. at: http://e-democracy.org/mpls

Reply via email to