Is there a rationale for corporate welfare discrimination? Listmembers don't seem to mind that other private, for-profit entities are stuffing their pockets with public money. Why the vitriol for sports?
Why weren't the same arguments made for Target Corporation, Ryan Construction, Allina, Sears, Cherryhomes & Minn, Dick Brustad, George Sherman, Hunt & Gregory, CSM Corporation, and an endless list of tax avoiders also known as non-Profiteers, etc. etc.? Just wondering why this logic only applies to sports facilities. Is it fuzzy thinking, or am I missing something. Vicky Heller North Oaks and Cedar-Riveride REMINDERS: 1. Think a member has violated the rules? Email the list manager at [EMAIL PROTECTED] before continuing it on the list. 2. Don't feed the troll! Ignore obvious flame-bait. For state and national discussions see: http://e-democracy.org/discuss.html For external forums, see: http://e-democracy.org/mninteract ________________________________ Minneapolis Issues Forum - A City-focused Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy Post messages to: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Subscribe, Un-subscribe, etc. at: http://e-democracy.org/mpls
