YESSS! Thank you, Phyllis - and Louisiana Supreme Court!

Ban the smoking!

Andy Driscoll
Saint Paul
--



on 4/23/04 10:32 AM, Phyllis Kahn wrote:

> I know why we can't pass a state wide smoking ban. To start we can't get
> the bills heard by Republican committee chairs. But I don't understand
> what is stopping the city of Minneapolis. Do we really need to fall
> behind not just New York City and Austin, Texas but Lexington, Kentucky?
> Here is a copy of the relevant article.
> 
> This article from the Star Tribune has been sent to you by Phyllis
> Kahn.
> 
> BYLINE: Marc Kaufman
> CREDITLINE: Washington Post
> HEADLINE: Smoke raises heart attack risk, CDC says
> 
> 
> WASHINGTON, D.C. -- For the first time, the Centers for Disease Control
> and Prevention (CDC) is warning people at risk of heart disease to avoid
> buildings and gathering places that allow indoor smoking.
> In commentary to a study in the British Medical Journal released
> Thursday, the CDC said doctors should advise people with heart problems
> that secondhand smoke can significantly increase their risk of a heart
> attack. The agency said that as little as 30 minutes' exposure can have
> a serious and even lethal effect.
> The commentary accompanied a study showing that the number of heart
> attacks in Helena, Mont., decreased substantially after the city banned
> indoor smoking.
> The number quickly returned to its former level after the law was
> struck down in court.
> That study found that, during the six months in 2002 when the ban was
> in effect, the number of heart attacks reported by Helena's single heart
> hospital fell by 40 percent.
> In his commentary, Terry Pechacek, associate director of science at
> CDC's Office on Smoking and Health, wrote that the research underscores
> evidence that secondhand smoke rapidly increases the tendency of blood
> to clot, which can restrict flow to the heart.
> Pechacek said the new study strengthens the growing body of research
> pointing to potentially fast and acute reactions to secondhand smoke, in
> addition to the long-term damage to nonsmokers who live with smokers.
> The CDC has estimated that secondhand smoke causes 35,000 heart disease
> deaths a year in the United States, but Pechacek said that estimate is
> likely to be revised upward.
> "We've said before that secondhand smoke increases the risk of heart
> disease in nonsmokers, but this is our first recommendation that
> clinicians advise their patients with heart disease to avoid indoor
> settings where smoking is allowed," he said.
> "We don't make these kind of statements lightly," he said. "What we are
> seeing in the data is a substantial biological change that occurs with
> even 30 minutes of exposure to secondhand smoke."
> Bans disputed
> The new recommendation is bound to become part of the often acrimonious
> national debate over whether smoking in public places should be banned.
> Public health advocates say the bans will save many lives, while
> cigarette makers and some businesspeople say the decision should be left
> to individual choice.
> Just Thursday, the Kentucky Supreme Court upheld a ban on smoking in
> bars, restaurants and other public places in Lexington, ruling that the
> city had acted within its authority to "promote and safeguard public
> health." That ban has drawn national attention because Kentucky has the
> highest smoking rate in the nation -- about one third of adults there
> are smokers, according to the CDC -- and is the second-largest producer
> of tobacco.
> As both the CDC and authors of the new study acknowledge, the Montana
> data are limited by the relatively small number of people involved.
> Pechacek said that similarly dramatic reductions in heart attacks are
> unlikely to be found in larger populations, but he said the study is
> nonetheless important because it offers the best real-world information
> to date on the connection between indoor smoking and serious heart
> problems. He said studies have been proposed or begun into the how
> indoor smoking bans in California, New York City and Delaware have
> affected heart attack rates.
> The CDC study's authors, Richard Sargent and Robert Shepard of St.
> Peter's Community Hospital in Helena, and Stanton Glantz of the
> University of California, San Francisco, collected information about the
> number of heart attacks from St. Peter's hospital records.
> During the six-month period in 2002 when the indoor smoking ban was in
> effect, 24 Helena residents suffered acute heart attacks. For the five
> years before and after 2002, the average number of heart attacks
> reported for Helena residents during the same six months was 40. The
> authors found through St. Peter's records that the number of heart
> attacks suffered by people living in the area outside Helena -- where
> there was no smoking ban -- did not experience the same 2002 dip as
> Helena.
> Of the patients followed in the study, 38 percent were current smokers,
> 29 percent were former smokers and 33 had never smoked.
> 
> 
> Phyllis Kahn,  District 59B
> REMINDERS:
> 1. Think a member has violated the rules? Email the list manager at
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] before continuing it on the list.
> 2. Don't feed the troll! Ignore obvious flame-bait.
> 
> For state and national discussions see: http://e-democracy.org/discuss.html
> For external forums, see: http://e-democracy.org/mninteract
> ________________________________
> 
> Minneapolis Issues Forum - A City-focused Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy
> Post messages to: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subscribe, Un-subscribe, etc. at: http://e-democracy.org/mpls
> 

REMINDERS:
1. Think a member has violated the rules? Email the list manager at [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
before continuing it on the list. 
2. Don't feed the troll! Ignore obvious flame-bait.

For state and national discussions see: http://e-democracy.org/discuss.html
For external forums, see: http://e-democracy.org/mninteract
________________________________

Minneapolis Issues Forum - A City-focused Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy
Post messages to: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe, Un-subscribe, etc. at: http://e-democracy.org/mpls

Reply via email to