> As a start, how about say 10 brand new bar licences,
> that must be and
> remain smoke-free? A licence to mint money - and
> provide a choice to
> non-smokers.
if in fact running a smoke free bar was a license to
mint money as you suggest, why do the bar owners need
a city sponsored ban to enact it?
If running a smoke free bar is so desired why hasn't
just one bar enacted its own rule and designated its
place non-smoking and advertise it, attracting the
non-smoking, pro-ban crowd?
for the record I do not and never have smoked. I just
don't see the point of more legislation.
John Harris
webber-camden
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Photos: High-quality 4x6 digital prints for 25�
http://photos.yahoo.com/ph/print_splash
REMINDERS:
1. Think a member has violated the rules? Email the list manager at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
before continuing it on the list.
2. Don't feed the troll! Ignore obvious flame-bait.
For state and national discussions see: http://e-democracy.org/discuss.html
For external forums, see: http://e-democracy.org/mninteract
________________________________
Minneapolis Issues Forum - A City-focused Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy
Post messages to: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe, Un-subscribe, etc. at: http://e-democracy.org/mpls
